Bangladesh’s Prime Minister: Hillary Clinton Personally Pressured Me to Help Foundation Donor

With all of the corruption in which she has been involved, it’s little wonder that Hillary is alleged to have remarked how she and other would “hang from ropes” if Donald Trump were elected president. She hasn’t been prosecuted yet, and you would be forgiven for doubting that she ever will be. But in the meantime the list of alleged criminal acts just continues to grow.

While secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made a personal call to pressure Bangladesh’s prime minister to aid a donor to her husband’s charitable foundation despite federal ethics laws that require government officials to recuse themselves from matters that could impact their spouse’s business.

In this case, Bangladesh officials have confirmed that this happened, so we’re not dealing with unsubstantiated rumor here.

The Office of Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina confirmed to Circa that Mrs. Clinton called her office in March 2011 to demand that Dr. Muhammed Yunus, a 2006 Nobel Peace prize winner, be restored to his role as chairman of the country’s most famous microcredit bank, Grameen Bank. The bank’s nonprofit Grameen America, which Yunus chairs, has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative. Grameen Research, which is chaired by Yunus, has donated between $25,000 and $50,000, according to the Clinton Foundation website.

As we’ve come to expect in such circumstances, it is thought unlikely that Mrs. Clinton will suffer any penalties for her misconduct.

Mrs. Clinton’s newly disclosed call to reinstate Dr. Yunus marks one of the most direct involvements in an official government matter that impacted one of her husband’s donors. It may trigger new calls for a criminal investigation into the foundation’s activities but “it’s not likely that anything would come of it,” said Richard Painter, former Chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush.

Even with the opinion that probably nothing will happen as a result of this latest evidence of corruption on Hillary’s part, there are those who continue to call for her to be tried for alleged acts.

But opponents of Mrs. Clinton, including President Trump before the election, have made calls for a criminal investigation into the foundation and whether there was a pay-for-play, in which they donors allegedly received favors from the State Department during her tenure from 2009-2013.

The Associated Press reported in August, that at least 85 of 154 “people from private interests who met or had phone conversations with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity” or pledged to donate to one of her international programs.

The Clintons present a stark contrast from what we would hope to see in public officials. In their continuous and aggressive efforts to enrich themselves through influence-peddling and a myriad of other criminal acts, they bring disgrace on simply everything they touch.

They are free today only because of the dedicated support of those who have benefited from their association with the Clintons, and from a Democratic Party that could not care less about their criminality.

Source: Circa