Israel’s Debkafile website reported on April 7th that two Syrian terrorist groups, the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian Revolutionary Front, both of them linked to al-Qaeda, were supplied with advanced US-made weapons, including armor-piercing, optically-guided BGM-71 TOW missiles.
Time magazine reported last month that Obama was considering giving our al-Qaeda terrorists enemies manpads, which are surface-to-air missles capable of shooting down commercial airliners.
I´ve heard this giving arms to terrorists classified as ´shifting positions´ in the war on terror. I call supplying our enemies with arms an act of treason.
ENSURING the demise of the U.S. by giving ADVANCED weapons to KNOWN terrorist isn’t TREASON, it’s “foreign policy”.
Best definition I’ve seen.
the military should arrest him (odumber)
This government continues to aide the enemy. Worst president ever.
So…Obama is “weak” on foreign policy if he doesn’t do something to fight the Syrian Army. Even though getting into a war in Syria is not what the American people wanted, we can’t afford it, and Congress wouldn’t approve it. But arming the opposition isn’t okay either??? You guys have to make up your minds. Either he has a part in Syria, and you deal with who gets weapons, or you take a isolationist approach. You can’t have it both ways! You think this might be why Obama takes time to think about things before rushing headlong into a war?
Arming his brothers
Mussies stick together, what a man?
by now you democrats have to knom that Obama is a big TERRORISTS HIM SELF we have to stop him
DEMORATS should have given one to OBUMMERS son TRAYVON