American liberals are very upset by the bluntness of President Trump’s remarks. He doesn’t couch his comments in “politician-speak” like Mr. Obama or Mrs. Clinton. He speaks plainly on whatever issue he chooses to address. While we’re not condoning profanity, some of his choices of words would make President Truman jealous.
Americans are also rather insular in that we don’t always pay a lot of attention to what is going on in other parts of the world. When it comes to bluntness and making blatant attacks on globalist bodies such as the United Nations, President Trump has some real competition in the form of President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines.
Duterte has the UN so upset that some of its officials are demanding he be subjected to a psychiatric evaluation. Undeterred in his clamp-down on drug dealers and other crime, Duterte has a few choice words for the UN in reply. If you’ve ever wanted to see someone go after the UN, page two is where you want to be.
would have been much more interesting a piece to not focus on the rights or wrongs of the that president, but rather more of a humorous line, such as how many people would love to feed the UN to a bed of crocs, the UN is a bunch of crocs, etc
Thanks. Will keep in mind. The guy is clearly quite the character. It’s easier to see the angle one should take with some articles than others. Other than obviously never to say anything nice about a liberal, largely because there never is anything nice you can honestly say about a liberal.
Was meant to be a cathartic piece, I should have stated that. I changed it up a bit
Just remember that you will never offend me by making a comment like, “This article should be approached from ________________ angle.” Or, “Play out this ___________________” part of the story. I have read your piece on the interests and nature of our audience. But you still know them better and are very welcome to shoot me a couple of words if you think the desired approach is not obvious. Thanks! Craig